Level 1 flows of an asset owner: the institutions that own the capital, with a Canadian public pension investment manager (the investment arm of a national pension plan, CAD 714,000,000,000 of net assets at the fiscal 2025 year-end, a benchmark portfolio of about 85% global equity and 15% Canadian government bonds (the reference portfolio until fiscal 2025), the base and the additional plans, a Crown corporation with an independent board accountable to the federal and provincial finance ministers, offices in Toronto, London, Hong Kong, Mumbai, New York, São Paulo and Sydney, AAA-rated debt, illustrative) as the worked example, grouped by function (liabilities and ALM, investing, funding, liquidity and collateral, operations and custody, control and regulation). Each diagram follows one flow with the fund at the center, the participants, the board and the actuary on one side, the managers, the dealers, the market, the custodian and the regulator on the other; the strip above it is the deal. Columns are the parties, rows the phases; numbered steps are messages, deliveries, payments or reports between them, with the channel or system in the pill. Hover a step for the detail, click it or use the walkthrough to be taken through the diagram step by step. The managers’ side of the same flows is on the buy-side page, the dealers’ side on the sell-side pages, the issuers’ side on the corporate treasury page, the rails on the market infrastructure page; the US flag opens the same cycle for a US life insurer. CAD and USD throughout; all numbers illustrative. New to this? Begin with Start here.
Function
Product
Mandate and Allocation
Investing
Funding, Leverage and Collateral
Operations and Custody
Control and Accountability
How the diagrams work, the flow common to all 16 diagrams, a map of the flows, which entity books each and what it takes in funding, capital and reporting, and a glossary.
Where a public pension investment manager’s money comes from and how its risk is set: the statutory mandate and the net contributions transferred by the government after the benefits are paid, the Chief Actuary’s triennial report with the return to beat, the two accounts with their risk targets, the independence and the public accountability; and the reference portfolio of 85% equity and 15% bonds that expresses the risk appetite, the total portfolio approach that measures every department against the factors it consumes, the currency policy and the value added published every year.
LiabilitiesThe plan’s promise sits with the government, not the fund: the contributions by statute, the benefits paid from the plan’s account, the net transferred weekly; the Chief Actuary’s 75-year projection sets the real return to earn.
DecisionThe board’s reference portfolio per account as the risk appetite; the risk budget with the absolute, the active and the leverage limits; the CIO’s strategic portfolio and the allocations to the departments.
ExecutionThe total portfolio group rebalancing to the reference with the index futures, the total return swaps and the baskets; the departments spending the factors; the currencies left open by policy.
SettlementThe net contributions on Lynx into the custodian accounts; the index positions at the global custodian; the derivatives at the CCPs and under the ISDAs with daily collateral; the IBOR each morning.
ControlThe value added over the reference net of all costs; the annual report tabled in Parliament; the triennial review; the special examination; the public meetings every two years.
How a Canadian pension investment manager invests across the world: the internal public market departments with their own desk, derivatives, lending and votes; the private equity program of fund commitments, co-investments and direct deals; the infrastructure and the real assets bought in consortia and held for decades; the credit book from direct lending to structured credit; and the external managers for what the fund does not build itself. Every department is measured against the equity and bond factors of the reference portfolio it consumes.
LiabilitiesNo liability on the fund’s books: the reference portfolio’s equity and bond factors are what each department consumes and must beat after its costs.
DecisionThe department mandates and the risk budgets; the investment and the credit committees on the memos; the board above the CIO’s authority; the consortium and the partner decisions.
ExecutionThe central desk through the brokers’ algorithms; the derivatives with the dealers and the clearing brokers; the auctions and the deal teams abroad; the syndicate desks and the lead loans; the external managers.
SettlementDVP at the global custodian at T+1 in North America; the CCPs for the cleared derivatives; the capital calls by wire; the loans on ClearPar through the agents; the managed accounts in the fund’s name.
ControlThe pre-trade compliance; the valuation committee and the independent appraisals; the trade reporting through the dealers; the value added by department; every cost published.
How a pension fund with no liabilities on its books still runs a balance sheet: the debt it issues in its own name (the commercial paper and the global and euro medium-term notes of a finance subsidiary with the fund’s guarantee, rated AAA, the green bonds); the recourse leverage, the liquidity coverage, the repo, the securities lending and the margin that let it hold the reference exposures while the private assets draw cash; and the currency hedges it keeps with the collateral behind them.
LiabilitiesNo liability on the fund’s books: the plan’s promise sits with the government; the fund’s obligations are its own debt, its repo, its derivatives’ margin and its unfunded commitments to the private funds.
DecisionThe board’s leverage limit, liquidity minimum, currency policy and counterparty limits; the treasury’s yearly funding plan; the daily funding and hedging decisions within them.
ExecutionThe CP posted to the dealers each morning; the benchmarks syndicated a few times a year; the repo and the lending with the dealers and the agents; the FX RFQs on the multi-dealer platforms.
SettlementThe CP the same day through DTC and CDS; the notes at T+5 through DTC and the ICSDs; the repo DVP or in the tri-party books; the FX through CLS; the margin at the CCPs and under the CSAs.
ControlThe leverage and the liquidity coverage reported daily and to the risk committee each quarter; the counterparty limits; the debt, the leverage and the hedges published in the annual report.
How the fund’s assets are held, serviced, valued and booked: the global custodian behind the public portfolio in fifty markets with the income, the corporate actions, the tax relief, the votes and the daily reconciliations; the closing of a private investment through a funds flow memo, a holding vehicle, the wires and the registers; and the valuation of the private half of the fund, the investment entity accounting and the audited annual report.
LiabilitiesNo policyholder ledger to run: the contributions and the benefits sit with the government; the fund’s operations serve its assets, its debt, its commitments and its public reporting.
DecisionThe custody model and the voting principles; the investment committee’s decisions and the funds flow sign-off; the valuation policy and the quarterly values approved by the committee.
ExecutionThe trades confirmed and instructed; the closings wired under dual approval with call-backs; the capital calls checked against the LPAs; the private marks proposed and challenged.
SettlementDVP through the custodian and its subcustodians in fifty markets; the private deals through the holding vehicles’ accounts and the registers; the income, the actions and the reclaims.
ControlThe IBOR, the ABOR and the custodian reconciled before the open; the funds flows reconciled; the valuation committee and the auditors’ specialists; the annual report tabled in Parliament.
How a public pension investment manager is held to account without a prudential regulator: the cycle of the quarterly results, the annual report tabled in Parliament, the public meetings, the triennial review, the directors’ appointments and the special examination; the risk oversight from the board’s appetite through the factor model, the limits, the counterparties, the operational and the climate risks to the three lines of defense; and the tax and the regulatory standing at home and abroad.
LiabilitiesThe plan’s obligations sit with the government; the fund answers for its returns, its costs and its risks to the ministers, Parliament and the contributors rather than to a capital regime.
DecisionThe board’s risk appetite, disclosure, tax and conduct policies; the ministers’ appointments and the triennial review; the CRO’s escalations; the tax and legal choices of each structure.
ExecutionThe quarterly and annual reporting; the public meetings; the daily limit monitoring; the filings with the regulators; the relief documentation and the foreign investment reviews.
SettlementThe reports on the site and before Parliament; the risk engine and the limits system; the holding vehicles’ registers; the reclaims and the clearances through the custody chain and the advisers.
ControlThe special examination every six years; the internal audit and the external auditors; the risk committee each quarter; the press, the contributors and Parliament as the standing scrutiny.
How to read a diagram
Columns are the partiesThe policyholders, the members and the sponsors on the left, the board, the actuary and the parent group, the asset owner in olive at the center (the subject of every diagram), the managers and the desks, the dealers and the banks, the issuers and the market, the custodian and the rails, and the ministers, Parliament and the auditors on the right.
Rows are the phasesTime runs down the page in the flow’s own cycle: the years of a liability, the annual policy, the quarterly allocation, the day of a trade, the settlement, the quarter-end books, the yearly filings. The band label gives the timing.
Arrows are stepsNumbered in order. Solid arrows are messages, deliveries or payments; dashed ones are standing flows like reports and reviews; two-headed ones are exchanged or negotiated. Boxes on the owner’s own lifeline are what it does internally: a valuation, an allocation, a reconciliation.
Pills are the channelAmber for voice and chat, blue for the platforms and portals (Bloomberg, the manager and custodian portals), rose for SWIFT messages, grey for the rails and the filings, teal for market data, lavender for the owner’s own systems (the ALM model, the IBOR, the policy administration). Each pill shows a one-line definition on hover.
The strip is the dealAbove each diagram the worked example strip gives the deal: the liability or the asset, the size, the counterparties, the settlement, the capital and the accounting, the reporting. Hovering a step shows the full detail; clicking it opens the walkthrough.
The grouping is by functionThe area tabs are the owner’s functions (liabilities and ALM, investing, funding, liquidity and collateral, operations and custody, control and regulation) and the product tabs under each are the flows. The facts table lists every flow with the same five columns. The flags open the same cycle for a US life insurer, a UK life insurer and a Dutch pension fund, where the liabilities, the regimes and the markets differ.
A flow can be read two ways: scroll the diagram and hover for detail, or press Walk through the steps above any diagram to follow it one step at a time, with the detail in a card. The arrow keys move forward and back.
The asset owner cycle every diagram is part of
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerClientMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Every diagram on this page is one turn of this cycle: the liabilities come in and are valued, the board sets the policy, the owner allocates and decides, the managers and the desks execute through the dealers, the assets settle at the custodian, and the books, the capital and the reporting follow. What the Canadian version shows is a pension investment manager with no liabilities of its own on its books: the contributions arrive by statute and the Chief Actuary sets the return the plan needs, the board owns the risk through a benchmark portfolio (the reference portfolio until fiscal 2025), the internal teams invest across the world in public and private markets with leverage and partners, the currencies stay largely unhedged, and the accountability runs to the finance ministers, Parliament and the public rather than to a prudential capital regime.
The flows, 16 of them
Each card opens its diagram. The tabs at the top do the same; the search box finds a flow by name, rule, report or keyword.
Who decides each flow, who executes it, where the assets settle and sit, what capital it takes, who it is reported to
The same five questions for every flow: who decides it, who executes it with the owner, where the assets settle and sit, what capital it takes and how it is accounted, and who it is reported to. The answers are what make an asset owner: liabilities that set the purpose, a board and an actuary that set the frame, managers and dealers that execute, a custodian that holds, and the finance ministers, Parliament and the Auditor General reading the capital and the reports.
Parliament and the provinces through the act and the plan; the board for the risk targets of the two accounts; the Chief Actuary for the return to beat
the revenue agency collecting the contributions; the government paying the benefits and transferring the net; the ministers reviewing every three years
the plan’s account at the government; the net contributions on Lynx into the fund’s accounts at the custodian; the two accounts invested together and allocated pro rata
no capital regime: the risk target per account from the actuarial report; IFRS fair value accounting of the investments; no tax in Canada and the treaties abroad
the annual report tabled in Parliament and sent to the provinces; the quarterly results; the special examination; the public meetings every two years
the board for the reference portfolio and the risk limits; the CIO for the strategic portfolio and the allocation of the active risk; the total portfolio group for the daily rebalancing
the investment departments and the external managers consuming the factors; the dealers and the prime brokers for the futures, the swaps and the index baskets
the index positions at the global custodian; the futures and the cleared swaps at the CCPs through the clearing brokers; the uncleared swaps under ISDAs with daily collateral; the IBOR
the absolute and the active risk measured on the factors; the leverage limit; IFRS fair value with the private valuations quarterly; the costs in dollars and basis points
the value added over the reference net of all costs in the annual report; the quarterly releases; the ministers at the triennial review; the public meetings
the department heads within their mandates and risk budgets; the central trading desk for the execution; the risk group and the pre-trade compliance in the OMS
the execution brokers and their algorithms; the swap dealers under ISDAs and CSAs; the clearing brokers at LCH and CME; the prime brokers for the short book; the proxy voting platform
DVP at the global custodian: T+1 through CDS and DTC, T+2 abroad through the sub-custodians; the cleared derivatives at the CCPs; the uncleared initial margin at a third-party custodian
the factor exposures and the active risk against the department benchmark; IFRS fair value; the operating costs of the in-house management; the commissions and the TCA
the trade reporting by the dealers under OSC Rule 91-507 and MI 96-101; every vote published; the department returns in the annual report
the investment committee on the memo, the board above the CIO’s authority; the deal teams in the offices; the valuation committee for the quarterly marks
the general partners under the LPAs and the side letters; the co-investment partners; the advisers and the acquisition lenders on the direct deals; the secondaries brokers and buyers
the capital calls and the distributions through the global custodian by wire; the fund administrator recording the commitments; the direct holdings in the holding companies
the levered equity factor the program consumes; IFRS 13 fair value with the GPs’ statements and the in-house valuations; the unfunded commitments in the liquidity plan
the returns net of fees, carry and costs against the factor benchmark in the annual report; the fees paid to the general partners disclosed
the investment committee and the board above the CIO’s authority; the asset management team for the ownership; the valuation committee
the consortium partners (other Canadian funds, the sovereign funds, the operators); the seller’s adviser; the project banks and the private placement investors for the asset-level debt
the closing funds flow by wire from the custodian; the shares or the concession rights in the consortium’s holding company; the distributions back through the holdco
the equity and bond share of each asset as its factor cost; the illiquidity premium; IFRS fair value from the independent appraisals; the local withholding under the treaties
the foreign investment reviews and the asset regulators abroad; the program returns and the largest assets in the annual report
the credit committee on the memo with the internal rating; the credit department’s portfolio managers for the syndicated and the secondary trades
the private equity sponsors and the origination partners; the arrangers’ syndicate desks; the secondary dealers; the third-party administrative agents
bonds DVP through DTC at the custodian; loans assigned on ClearPar and recorded in the agent’s register; the payments through the agents to the custodian
the bond and the equity factors each position consumes; IFRS fair value with the private loans valued quarterly; the default losses against the budget
the credit returns in the annual report; the lenders’ reports from the agents; the borrowers’ compliance certificates to the fund
the external portfolio management team selects and monitors; the investment committee approves the managers, the sizes and the terms
the hedge funds, the emerging markets and the specialist managers under IMAs or LPAs with side letters; the prime brokers of the managed accounts; the transition manager
the managed accounts in the fund’s name at its custodian with an independent administrator; the fund subscriptions and redemptions through the administrators
the active risk drawn from the department’s budget; the management and the performance fees verified against the administrator; IFRS fair value
the external management and performance fees in dollars in the annual report; the value added measured after them
the board’s leverage limit and the program approvals; the treasury’s yearly funding plan; the CFO and the treasurer for each benchmark
the CP dealers; the MTN dealers and the bookrunners; the issuing and paying agents; the external reviewer for the green bonds
the CP the same day through DTC’s money market instruments program and CDS; the notes at T+5 through DTC, Euroclear, Clearstream and CDS; the proceeds into the fund’s accounts
no regulatory capital; the debt at amortized cost under IFRS beside the fair value investments; the recourse leverage against the board’s limit; the guarantee of the fund
the debt by program, currency and maturity in the annual report tabled in Parliament; the green bond allocation reports; the agencies’ reviews; the program documents on the site
the board’s leverage limit and liquidity minimum; the risk committee on the stress results; the treasury for the daily funding decisions
the repo dealers, the tri-party agents and the sponsored and cleared repo services; the lending agents and the borrowers; the clearing brokers and the swap dealers for the margin
the repo DVP through CDS and Fedwire or in the tri-party books; the cleared margin at the CCPs; the uncleared IM at a third-party custodian; the IBOR and the custodian records
the recourse leverage against the board’s limit; the liquidity coverage over thirty days and a year; the internal transfer rate to the departments; IFRS fair value of the investments
daily leverage and liquidity reports to the CIO and the CFO; quarterly to the risk committee; the leverage and the liquidity in the annual report
the board’s strategic currency policy and counterparty limits; the currency team for the program and the deal hedges; the collateral team for the daily allocation
the FX dealers in competitive RFQs on FXall and 360T; the CSA counterparties; the tri-party agents and the third-party IM custodians
CLS through the settlement member with the Canadian dollar on Lynx; the non-CLS currencies gross through the custodian; the collateral at the tri-party agents and the custodians
the hedges at fair value in the investment income under IFRS; the counterparty exposure net of collateral against the limits; the encumbered assets in the liquidity measure
the counterparty report to the risk committee; the currency exposure and the hedges in the annual report; the derivatives reported to the trade repositories by the dealers
the operations group under the CFO for the custody model and the controls; the custody agreement approved by management; the voting principles approved by the board
the global custodian and its subcustodians; the executing brokers and the dealers; the voting platform; the custodian’s tax service
DVP in CDS, DTC, Euroclear, Clearstream and the local CSDs; the custody accounts by plan and market; the IBOR, the ABOR and the data platform reconciled daily
the tax relief and the reclaims in the investment income; IFRS fair value of the public positions at the market prices; the costs of custody in the operating expenses
the votes and the voting principles on the fund’s site; the custody and the operating costs in the annual report; the controls reviewed by the internal and the external auditors
the investment committee and the board above its authority; the deal team for the terms; the treasury and legal for the funds flow and the structure
the paying banks and the escrow agent; the FX dealers for the currency; the sellers, the target’s lenders and the consortium partners; counsel and the tax advisers
wires through Lynx, Fedwire and CHAPS from the holding vehicles’ accounts; the share registers and the land registry; the IBOR and the commitment ledger
the holding vehicles as investment entities at fair value; the investment at cost until the first valuation; the treaty and the sovereign immunity positions for the tax
the investments over a threshold announced in a press release; the clearances filed with the foreign authorities; the transactions in the annual report
the board and its audit committee for the valuation policy and the statements; the valuation committee chaired by the CFO for the quarterly values
the pricing vendors and the market sources; the general partners’ statements; the independent appraisers and the valuation advisers; the external auditors
the values in the general ledger from the IBOR and the approved marks; the level 3 files with their inputs; the commitment ledger for the funds
IFRS 13 fair value with the hierarchy; the investment entity under IFRS 10 at fair value through profit or loss; the net income allocated to the two accounts; the costs in dollars and basis points
the audited financial statements in the annual report tabled in Parliament and sent to the provinces; the quarterly results; the level 3 sensitivities in the notes
the board for the annual report and the disclosure policy; the federal minister for the tabling and the appointments; the ministers jointly for the triennial review
the external auditors for the statements and the special examination; the nominating committee with the provinces; the public affairs team
the reports on the fund’s site; the annual report laid before Parliament; the special examination report to the board and the minister
no prudential capital regime; the audited IFRS statements; the value added and the costs as the measures; the compensation disclosed
Parliament, the federal and the provincial ministers, the contributors at the public meetings, the press; the parliamentary committees on invitation
the board and its risk committee for the appetite and the limits; the CRO and the independent risk group; the departments as the first line
the counterparties under the limits; the market, the climate and the ESG data providers; the internal audit and the external auditors
the positions from the IBOR and the custodian; the risk engine with the factor model; the limits system; the incident and the third-party registers
no regulatory capital; the absolute and the active risk, the leverage and the liquidity against the board’s limits; the private assets on their factor exposures
daily to the CIO and the CRO; quarterly to the risk committee; the risk and the climate sections of the annual report; the special examination
the board for the tax and the conduct policies; the general counsel and the head of tax; the deal teams for the structures with the tax and legal teams
the custodian’s tax services and the tax advisers; the counsel for the foreign investment reviews; the dealers reporting the derivatives on the fund’s behalf
the holding vehicles’ accounts and registers; the relief documentation and the reclaims through the custody chain; the filings on SEDAR+ and with the foreign authorities
tax-exempt at home; the foreign taxes in the investment income; the reclaims receivable; the investment entity accounting of the holding vehicles
the early warning and the insider reports; the derivatives trade reports; the foreign investment filings; the taxes and the structures summarized in the annual report
Glossary
The terms that come back on every diagram. Every pill in the diagrams also shows its definition on hover.
Mandate and Allocation
Base plan: The original layer of the national pension plan, partly funded since the 1997 reform raised the contribution rate to 9.9%: the assets cover a part of the obligations and the contributions the rest, so the account can take more investment risk and draws on its investment income once the benefits exceed the contributions in the early 2030s.
Additional plan: The enhancement layer added by the 2016 legislation, funded by its own contributions since 2019 (2% on the earnings up to the ceiling) and 2024 (8% on a second band above it), designed to be fully funded and so invested with a lower risk target and a longer accumulation, into the late 2050s, than the base plan.
Net contributions: The contributions collected by the revenue agency minus the benefits the government pays out of the plan’s account, transferred to the fund weekly; positive for the base plan until the early 2030s and for the additional plan until the late 2050s, after which the fund transfers investment income back.
Chief Actuary: The federal officer, within the prudential regulator but independent in his opinions, whose triennial actuarial report projects the national pension plan over 75 years, sets the minimum contribution rate and the real return assumption the fund must earn, and is tabled in Parliament and peer reviewed.
Minimum contribution rate: The contribution rate the Chief Actuary computes as sufficient to keep the plan sustainable over 75 years under the report’s assumptions (9.2% for the base plan against the legislated 9.9%, illustrative); if the legislated rate fell below it and the ministers did not act, the act’s default provisions would raise the rate and freeze the indexation.
Triennial review: The review of the national pension plan by the federal and provincial finance ministers every three years on the Chief Actuary’s report: the contribution rates, the benefits, the fund’s results; a change to the plan or to the fund’s act needs two thirds of the participating provinces with two thirds of the population.
Special examination: The examination of a Crown corporation’s systems and practices (the financial controls, the investment and risk management, the governance) at least every six years by its auditor, with the report to the board and the minister; the finance minister can call one at any time.
Public meeting: The meeting a public pension investment manager must hold in each participating province every two years, where the contributors and the public question the management on the returns, the costs and the policies; a statutory duty under the fund’s act.
Maple model: The governance model of the large Canadian public pension funds: an arm’s-length board of professionals, a mandate limited to returns without undue risk, the freedom to hire investment staff at market rates and to invest directly in private markets at scale, and a heavy public accountability in return; copied by funds abroad.
Crown corporation: A federal or provincial government-owned corporation (CMHC, EDC, BDC, the provincial financing authorities) whose debt carries the government’s guarantee; the Canadian agency market.
Reference portfolio: The simple passive portfolio (85% global public equity and 15% Canadian government bonds for the base plan, illustrative) that expresses a pension investment manager’s risk appetite and serves as the benchmark its net return is measured against after all costs; the risk target and the yardstick in one line; some funds now call it the benchmark portfolio and keep the market risk target apart.
Market risk target: The level of market risk, expressed as a reference portfolio’s equity and bond mix or as a loss measure, that a fund’s board sets for each account from the actuary’s return assumption and the funding profile; the base and the additional plans carry different targets.
Total portfolio approach: The management of a fund as one portfolio rather than a set of asset class buckets: every investment, public or private, is decomposed into its exposures to the reference factors (the global equity, the bond) and the residual, the total exposure is held at the reference’s risk by the balancing portfolio, and each department is measured on what it adds over the factors it consumes.
Balancing portfolio: The public index positions and the derivatives (the equity and bond futures, the total return swaps) that fill the gap between the active departments’ factor consumption and the reference portfolio’s exposures; sold to fund the private capital calls, it is where the fund’s leverage and liquidity are managed day to day.
Strategic portfolio: The long-term target mix of the active programs and the balancing portfolio that the CIO sets within the reference portfolio’s risk: the tilts to the private equity, the real assets, the credit and the emerging markets, reviewed each year with the realized premiums and the capacity of the private markets.
Risk budget: The board’s limits on the risk the fund may take: the absolute risk of the total portfolio within a band around the reference’s, the active risk the departments may use against the reference, the leverage limit on the debt, the repo and the derivatives, the liquidity minimum and the concentration limits.
Active risk: The risk a portfolio takes relative to its benchmark, measured as the volatility or the loss at a confidence level of the difference between the two; the budget the departments spend to add value over the reference portfolio.
Value added: A fund’s net return minus the return of its reference or benchmark portfolio over the period, after all costs (the operating expenses, the external management and performance fees, the transaction costs), in percentage points and in dollars; the measure of the active management the Canadian funds publish each year.
Strategic currency policy: A fund’s standing decision on how much of its foreign currency exposure to hedge: the large Canadian funds leave the developed currencies largely unhedged (the long horizon, the Canadian dollar’s fall in global downturns, the contributors’ imported consumption, the cost and the collateral of hedging) and hedge some emerging currencies.
Total return swap: A swap in which one party pays the total return of an index or a basket (the price change and the dividends) and receives a financing rate; the way a fund takes or sheds an equity exposure without buying the shares, under an ISDA with daily collateral.
Illiquidity premium: The extra return an investor expects from an asset that cannot be sold quickly (private equity, infrastructure, real estate, private credit) over the public assets with the same factor exposures; the reason a long-horizon fund tilts toward the private markets and the number the total portfolio approach tests.
Investing
Program trade: The execution of a basket of many stocks at once, either as an agency trade worked with the algorithms or as a risk bid in which the broker guarantees a price for the whole basket for a fee; the way an index portfolio or a transition is traded.
Implementation shortfall: The difference between the price at the moment the decision to trade was made and the price actually achieved, including the costs and the unfilled part; the benchmark of the transaction cost analysis and the name of the algorithms that minimize it.
TCA: Transaction cost analysis: measuring execution quality against benchmarks (arrival price, VWAP, implementation shortfall) by broker, algorithm and venue.
Commission sharing: An arrangement under which part of the commission paid to executing brokers funds research from third parties (CSA or soft dollars under Section 28(e)).
NI 94-101: The Canadian national instrument on the mandatory central counterparty clearing of derivatives (2017): the dealers and the large financial institutions that are local counterparties must clear the mandated classes (the CAD, USD, EUR and GBP interest rate swaps and overnight index swaps) through a clearing agency; the end users hedging their commercial risk are exempt.
OSC Rule 91-507: The Ontario rule on the trade repositories and the derivatives data reporting (with MI 96-101 in the other provinces), rewritten in 2025 with the UTI, the UPI and the critical data elements: the dealer reports each swap to a recognized trade repository, the end user only where no dealer is on the other side.
Clearing broker: The clearing member (a bank or a large investment firm) that clears a client’s exchange-traded and OTC derivatives and repo at the CCPs under EMIR’s client clearing rules, with the omnibus or individually segregated accounts; the counterpart of the US FCM.
Securities lending: The lending of securities from a portfolio to the borrowers (the brokers and the short sellers) against cash or securities collateral and a fee, through the custodian’s program or a third-party agent with an indemnity against the borrower’s default; the lender recalls the shares to vote them.
Proxy voting: The voting of the shares a fund owns at the companies’ meetings, under its published principles, through a voting platform, with the proxy advisers’ research as an input; the large Canadian funds publish every vote.
Global custodian: The bank that holds an institution’s securities and cash in every market through its own branches and the sub-custodians, settles the trades, collects the income, processes the corporate actions, runs the securities lending and reports the positions daily.
Co-investment: An investment made directly in a company alongside a general partner’s fund, usually without management fee or carried interest; the right to co-invest is negotiated in the side letter of the fund commitment and lowers the program’s average cost.
LPA: The limited partnership agreement of a private fund: the commitment, the investment period, the capital calls and the distributions, the management fee and the carried interest with the preferred return, the governance with the LP advisory committee, the key person and the removal clauses.
Side letter: An agreement between a fund and one investor beside the LPA: the fee discount, the co-investment rights, the reporting and the transparency, the most favored nation clause, the excuse rights; the instrument through which the largest investors get the terms their size commands.
Management fee: The fee a fund manager charges on the committed or the invested capital (1.5% to 2% for a buyout fund, less at scale) or on the assets of an account, to run the business; distinct from the performance fee or the carried interest.
Carried interest: The general partner’s share of the profits of a private fund (20% over a preferred return of 8%, illustrative) paid after the investors have received their capital and the preferred return, under the waterfall of the LPA.
Capital call: A private fund drawing down part of the client’s commitment; the client wires the amount by the due date.
J-curve: The negative returns of a private fund in its first years, when the fees and the costs are paid before the investments gain value, followed by the positive returns as the exits come; the shape of a young private equity program’s net returns.
Secondaries: The market in which the investors sell their stakes in private funds (the LP-led sales of fund portfolios) and the general partners move assets into continuation vehicles (the GP-led deals), at a discount or a premium to the net asset value, through brokers and to dedicated secondaries buyers.
Valuation committee: The committee of a fund that reviews and approves the quarterly valuations of the private holdings (the general partners’ statements, the in-house models, the independent appraisals) before they enter the accounts, under the valuation policy and IFRS 13.
Investment committee: The committee of the senior investment staff that approves the investments above a department’s authority on a written memo, with the board approving above the committee’s limits.
Consortium: A group of investors (pension funds, sovereign funds, an operating partner) bidding for and owning a large asset together under a consortium or a shareholders’ agreement that sets the equity split, the governance, the reserved matters and the exit rights.
Auction process: The sale of a company or an asset through competing bids: the teaser and the non-disclosure agreement, the information memorandum, the non-binding bids, the shortlist, the data room and the management presentations, the binding bids with the marked-up purchase agreement, the selection and the signing.
Concession: A contract by which a government grants a company the right to build or operate an infrastructure asset (a toll road, a port, an airport) for a period, against the tariffs or the payments the contract sets, with the asset returning to the government at the end.
Foreign investment review: A host country’s review of a foreign acquisition on national security or national interest grounds: the CFIUS in the US, the National Security and Investment Act in the UK, the FIRB in Australia, the screening mechanisms of the EU states, the Investment Canada Act at home; the approval can carry conditions on the governance and the data.
Independent appraiser: The valuer that values a property or an infrastructure asset for its owner, at least yearly, on the discounted cash flows and the comparable transactions, independent of the investment team; the basis of the fair value in the accounts.
Direct lending: Loans made by a non-bank lender (a private credit fund, a pension fund, an insurer) directly to a company, usually a mid-market company owned by a private equity sponsor, held to maturity rather than syndicated; priced over the syndicated loans for the certainty and the speed.
Unitranche: A single loan combining the senior and the subordinated debt of a buyout at one blended margin, provided by one or a few direct lenders, with one set of documents and covenants; the standard instrument of the direct lending market.
Leveraged loan: A senior secured loan to a company rated below investment grade or highly indebted, usually to finance a buyout, syndicated by the arranging banks to the institutional investors (the CLOs, the funds, the pension funds) and traded in the secondary market on the LSTA documents.
Administrative agent: The bank or the third-party firm that administers a loan for the lenders: the register of the lenders, the notices, the rate resets, the collection and the distribution of the interest and the principal, the amendments and the lenders’ votes, the consent to the assignments.
ClearPar: The settlement platform for syndicated loan trades: documents, signatures and funding memos.
LSTA: The Loan Syndications and Trading Association: the New York market’s forms, trading conventions and settlement standards for syndicated loans under New York law; the US counterpart of the LMA.
ABS: Asset-backed securities: bonds issued by a trust that holds a pool of receivables (auto loans, credit cards, student loans, equipment leases) and pays the holders from the collections, in tranches of different seniority.
CLO: A collateralized loan obligation: a securitization of broadly syndicated leveraged loans, actively managed for a reinvestment period and financed by rated floating-rate notes and an equity tranche; the Japanese investors are the largest buyers of the AAA tranches.
Royalty financing: Financing provided against a share of a product’s or a resource’s future revenue (a drug’s sales, a mine’s production, a music catalog) rather than against the borrower’s balance sheet; a specialty finance strategy of the large funds.
Managed account: A separate account opened in the investor’s name at its own custodian and traded by an external manager as its agent under an IMA, with full position transparency and the right to take the assets back at once; the alternative to the commingled hedge fund.
Operational due diligence: The review of a manager’s operations before an investment and periodically after: the trading and the valuation controls, the administrator and the auditor, the custody of the assets, the compliance, the cybersecurity and the business continuity; separate from the investment due diligence.
IMA: The investment management agreement between an asset owner and a manager: the mandate, the guidelines and the limits, the benchmark, the fee, the reporting, the termination.
Most favored nation clause: A side letter clause giving an investor the right to the better terms the manager grants to other investors of the same or a smaller size; the largest investors’ protection against a fee discount given to someone else.
Hurdle: The return a fund must earn before the incentive fee applies.
High-water mark: The level the fund’s NAV must exceed before the incentive fee is earned again after a loss.
Transition management: The service that moves a portfolio from one manager or strategy to another at the lowest cost: the crossing of the overlapping positions, the trading of the rest over days with the algorithms, the pre-trade estimate and the post-trade report on the implementation shortfall.
Funding, Leverage and Collateral
Commercial paper: Unsecured short-term notes of up to a year issued at a discount under a program, sold through dealers to the money funds, the corporate treasuries and the bank treasuries, and settled the same day through the depository’s money market service; the cheapest short funding for a highly rated issuer.
Rule 144A: The SEC safe harbor for the resale of unregistered securities to qualified institutional buyers, under which a non-US issuer sells notes into the US without a registration statement; paired with Regulation S for the sales outside the US in a global offering.
Regulation S: The SEC rule under which securities sold outside the US are not subject to the US registration requirement; the Regulation S tranche of a global note settles through Euroclear and Clearstream beside the 144A tranche at DTC.
SSA market: The market for the bonds of the supranationals, the sovereigns and the agencies: the benchmark formats, the syndicate desks, the official and bank treasury buyers, the pricing over mid-swaps; the large public pension funds’ notes trade in it.
Green bond framework: The issuer’s published framework for its green bonds: the eligible project categories, the selection and evaluation process, the management of the proceeds and the yearly allocation and impact reporting, reviewed by an external party against the market’s green bond principles.
Leverage limit: The board’s cap on a fund’s recourse leverage (the debt it issues, the repo it borrows, the financing embedded in its derivatives) as a share of its net assets, monitored daily and reported in the annual report.
Recourse leverage: The borrowing a fund must repay or margin itself (its own debt, its repo, the financing in its derivatives), as distinct from the debt inside its portfolio companies and real assets, which is recourse only to those assets.
Liquidity coverage: A fund’s measure of the liquid assets it could raise in a stress against the outflows it could face (the margin, the capital calls, the collateral, the maturing debt) over thirty days and a year, against a minimum set by the board.
Transfer rate: The internal rate at which a fund charges its departments for the capital and the funding they use and credits them for the cash they return, so that each investment is measured against its factor cost and its funding.
Collateral transformation: Lending high-quality assets (government bonds) against lower-quality collateral (equities, corporate bonds) to earn a spread, or the reverse to obtain the high-quality assets a margin call requires; limited by the liquidity rules since both sides must be unwound in a stress.
Credit support annex: The annex to an ISDA master agreement that sets the collateral terms between two parties: the threshold, the minimum transfer amount, the eligible collateral and the haircuts, the valuation and the timing of the calls.
Uncleared margin rules: The rules (in force in phases from 2016 to 2022) requiring the variation margin and, above a threshold, the initial margin on uncleared derivatives between financial entities, the initial margin computed with a standard model and held in segregated accounts at a third-party custodian; physically settled FX forwards and swaps are exempt from the initial margin in most jurisdictions.
Deal-contingent forward: An FX forward that only becomes effective if an acquisition closes (on a regulatory approval, for instance), with no payment if it does not; the dealer charges the probability-weighted cost in the rate.
Settlement member: A bank that is a member of CLS and submits and funds the trades of its third-party clients, such as a pension fund, which settle payment versus payment in CLS without being members.
FX Global Code: The set of principles of good practice in the wholesale FX market (ethics, governance, execution, information sharing, risk management, confirmation and settlement) published in 2017 and updated since, to which the dealers and the large buy-side firms sign statements of commitment.
Operations and Custody
Subcustodian: The local bank a global custodian uses to reach a market where it is not a direct member of the depository; it holds the assets in the global custodian’s name for the end client and follows the local settlement and corporate action rules.
Master custody agreement: The contract between an institution and its global custodian: the accounts and the segregation, the standard of care and the liability, the subcustodian network, the cash and the overdrafts, the services (tax, proxy, lending, data) and the fees.
Relief at source: The application of a reduced or nil withholding rate when the income is paid, on the documentation of the beneficial owner’s status (a treaty residence, a foreign government or pension exemption) filed through the custody chain, instead of the full rate withheld and reclaimed later.
Tax reclaim: The claim filed with a foreign tax authority to recover the withholding tax deducted above the rate a treaty or an exemption allows; some markets take months, others years.
Proxy voting platform: The platform through which an institution receives the meeting materials, records its voting decisions and casts its votes across the markets, with the vote record it publishes.
Data platform: The institution’s own data store where the custodian’s positions, the dealers’ confirmations, the CCPs’ statements, the private valuations and the market data meet, so that the IBOR, the accounting, the risk and the performance read the same golden copy.
Funds flow memo: The closing document of a private transaction that lists every payment (the purchase price, the debt repaid, the fees, the escrows) with its amount, currency, account and timing, signed off by the parties and their counsel before the wires are released.
Holding vehicle: A wholly owned subsidiary through which an institution holds a private investment in a country or a strategy, chosen for the treaty access, the local governance and the limitation of the liability, measured at fair value in the parent fund’s statements.
Call-back: The control of confirming a payment instruction or a change of bank details by telephone to a number already on file, never to one given in the message that carried the instruction; the main defense against the business email compromise.
Business email compromise: A fraud in which a forged or hijacked email changes the receiving account of a legitimate payment (a closing, a capital call, a supplier invoice); the largest single source of payment fraud losses for institutions and companies.
Escrow: An amount held by a neutral agent under an escrow agreement until a condition is met (the warranty period of a sale, a regulatory approval), then released to one party or the other.
Commitment ledger: The record of an investor’s commitments to the private funds: the committed, the called, the unfunded, the distributed and the recallable, by fund and by vintage; the input to the liquidity forecast.
IFRS 13: The IFRS standard on fair value measurement: the exit price between market participants and the three-level hierarchy (quoted prices, observable inputs, unobservable inputs), with the disclosures of the level 3 inputs and their sensitivities.
Fair value hierarchy: The three levels of IFRS 13 and ASC 820: level 1 quoted prices in active markets, level 2 other observable inputs, level 3 unobservable inputs such as the private valuations; the level drives the disclosure and the audit attention.
Investment entity: Under IFRS 10, an entity that obtains funds to invest them for returns and measures its investments at fair value; it does not consolidate the companies it controls but carries them at fair value through profit or loss.
Roll-forward: The adjustment of a stale private fund statement to the reporting date for the capital calls, the distributions and the market moves since its date, so that the fund’s quarter-end value does not lag a quarter behind.
Audit committee: The board committee that oversees the financial reporting, the external auditor and the internal audit; it recommends the financial statements to the board.
Control and Accountability
Risk appetite statement: The board’s statement of the risks an institution accepts and the limits that express them (the market, the credit, the liquidity, the leverage, the concentration, the operational and the zero tolerance items), monitored by the risk function and reviewed yearly.
Factor model: The risk model that maps every holding to its exposures to a small set of common factors (the equity markets, the rates, the credit spreads, the currencies, the commodities) plus a residual, so that the public and the private assets are measured on the same basis.
Stress test: The revaluation of a portfolio under a historical episode (2008, March 2020, 2022) or a hypothetical scenario (a stagflation, a currency shock) to measure the loss and the liquidity need the expected loss measures do not show.
Wrong-way risk: The risk that the exposure to a counterparty rises as its credit quality falls (a dealer heavily exposed to the market moves that increase what it owes); measured and limited in the counterparty framework.
Third-party risk: The risk from the outside firms an institution relies on (the custodian, the administrators, the external managers, the technology vendors), managed through the due diligence, the contracts, the monitoring and the exit plans.
Net zero target: A commitment to bring the net greenhouse gas emissions of a portfolio (and the operations) to zero by a date, usually 2050, with interim targets; set by many asset owners from 2020, revised or withdrawn by several from 2024 as the legal and the political settings changed.
Section 892: The US tax code section that exempts the investment income of a foreign government and its controlled entities (including the public pension funds) from stocks, bonds and other financial instruments, but not the income from commercial activities or received from a controlled commercial entity; the final regulations were issued on December 15, 2025.
Controlled commercial entity: Under section 892, an entity engaged in commercial activities in which a foreign government holds 50% or more or has effective control; it loses the section 892 exemption on all its income, and the income it pays to the government is not exempt.
FIRPTA: The Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980: the US tax on the gains of foreign persons from US real property interests, collected by withholding; the qualified foreign pension funds have been exempt since 2015.
Qualified foreign pension fund: A foreign pension fund that meets the US conditions (established to provide retirement benefits, regulated, with no single participant entitled to more than 5% of the assets) and is exempt from FIRPTA on its US real property gains since 2015.
Sovereign immunity regime: A country’s tax exemption for the investment income of foreign governments and their entities (the UK’s on an HMRC clearance, Australia’s on a ruling with conditions on the size and influence of the stake), relied on by the public pension funds beside the treaties.
CFIUS: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, which reviews the foreign investments in US businesses for national security; filings are mandatory for some investments by foreign government-controlled investors and in the critical technologies, and the review can impose mitigation or block a deal.
NSI Act: The UK National Security and Investment Act 2021: the mandatory notification of the acquisitions in seventeen sensitive sectors and the government’s power to call in and condition or block a transaction.
FIRB: The Foreign Investment Review Board, which advises the Australian Treasurer on the foreign investment applications; foreign government investors need approval for most direct investments, often with tax conditions.
Early warning report: The NI 62-103 and 62-104 report an investor files on reaching 10% of a class of a reporting issuer’s securities (and at each further 2%), with a press release and a moratorium on further purchases; the alternative monthly reporting system serves passive institutional investors.
Alternative monthly reporting: The Canadian regime under which an eligible institutional investor (a pension fund, a mutual fund, a financial institution) that does not intend to influence or acquire the issuer reports its 10% holdings within ten days after each month end instead of the immediate early warning report.
Lobbying registration: The federal and provincial registration of the employees or the consultants who communicate with the public office holders on the laws, the policies or the contracts, with the monthly communication reports; applicable to a Crown corporation’s staff when they lobby.
Information barrier: The controls that keep the material non-public information obtained by one team (a director on an issuer’s board, a deal team in a private negotiation) away from the teams trading the issuer’s securities, with the restricted and the watch lists.
SWIFT message types used in the diagrams
MT300: SWIFT confirmation of an FX trade.
MT305: SWIFT confirmation of an FX option.
MT320: SWIFT confirmation of a fixed-term loan or deposit.
MT950: SWIFT account statement from a correspondent bank.
camt.053: ISO 20022 end-of-day bank account statement, the successor to MT950.
MT535: SWIFT statement of securities holdings from a custodian.
MT541: SWIFT instruction to receive securities against payment.
MT543: SWIFT instruction to deliver securities against payment.
camt.057: ISO 20022 notice to the account holding bank or custodian to expect an incoming payment, the successor of the MT210.
MT900: SWIFT debit confirmation from a bank.
MT304: SWIFT advice of an FX trade from a manager to its custodian, so the custodian can settle it.
MT545: SWIFT confirmation from the custodian that securities were received against payment.
MT547: SWIFT confirmation from the custodian that securities were delivered against payment.
MT548: SWIFT settlement status from the custodian: pending, matched, failed, with the reason.
MT566: SWIFT corporate action confirmation: the cash or securities credited for an event.
MT540-543: SWIFT instructions to receive or deliver securities, with or without payment; used to move collateral.
MT515: SWIFT client confirmation of a securities trade.
MT527: SWIFT triparty collateral instruction.
MT600: SWIFT confirmation of a precious metals trade.
MT604: SWIFT precious metals transfer or allocation instruction.
MT670: SWIFT standing settlement instruction update: how a counterparty notifies its SSIs by authenticated message.
MT340: SWIFT confirmation of a forward rate agreement.
MT564: SWIFT corporate action notification from a custodian or depository: the event, the options and the deadline.
MT502: SWIFT order to buy or sell securities, sent by a client to its broker or manager.
MT509: SWIFT trade status message from a broker or custodian.
MT101: The SWIFT request for transfer a corporate sends its bank, or a bank sends another, to move funds from the customer’s account.
MT700: The SWIFT message by which a bank issues a documentary credit to the advising bank.
MT710: The SWIFT advice of a documentary credit issued by a third bank, sent by the advising bank onward.
MT742: The SWIFT reimbursement claim a paying or negotiating bank sends the reimbursing bank under a documentary credit.
MT754: The SWIFT advice of payment, acceptance or negotiation sent by the paying bank to the issuing bank under a documentary credit.
MT799: The SWIFT free-format message between banks, used for trade finance correspondence and bank-to-bank undertakings.
MT940: The SWIFT customer statement message a bank sends an account holder (or its other bank) with the day’s entries and balances.
MT540: The SWIFT instruction to receive securities free of payment, used for the stock loans and the collateral deliveries.
MT306: The Swift confirmation of the FX options the MT305 cannot describe: average rate (Asian) options and forwards, barriers, digitals and other exotic structures, with their averaging or observation dates.
MT380: The Swift FX order: an investment manager instructs its custodian to buy or sell a currency for a fund; the custodian confirms the execution with an MT381.
MT606: The Swift precious metal debit advice: the account keeper tells the account owner its metal account was debited, with the bar list when the metal moves into allocated bars.
MT607: The Swift precious metal credit advice: the account keeper tells the account owner its metal account was credited, in fine troy ounces.
MT608: The Swift statement of a metal account: the opening and closing balances in ounces and the movements of the period, or the bars held in an allocated account.
Mandate and Allocation›Mandate and Contributions
The Mandate and the Contributions: the Statute, the Net Inflows, the Chief Actuary and the Accountability to the Ministers
A public pension investment manager from its foundations: the statutory mandate to maximize returns without undue risk of loss, the contributions collected with the payroll into the plan’s account and the net contributions transferred to the fund after the benefits are paid, the Chief Actuary’s triennial report with the real return the assets must earn over 75 years, the two accounts with their different risk targets, the independence of the board from the government, and the accountability through the annual report tabled in Parliament, the ministers’ triennial review, the special examination and the public meetings in each province.
Worked example, illustrative:the fund CAD 700,000,000,000 of net assets in two accounts: the base plan and the additional plan; a Crown corporation with its own actthe inflows contributions at 9.9% of the pensionable earnings for the base plan and 2% and 8% on the two bands for the additional plan; the net transferred weekly on Lynxthe actuary a triennial report over 75 years: a minimum contribution rate of 9.2% against 9.9% legislated; real returns of 4% and 3.5% to earn, illustrativethe accounts the base plan partly funded with a higher risk target; the additional plan fully funded by its contributions with a lower onethe independence twelve directors from a nominating committee with the provinces; no ministerial direction; two thirds of the provinces to amend the actthe accountability the annual report tabled in Parliament; the triennial review; the special examination every six years; the public meetings every two years
Group entitiesThe asset ownerClientMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to10 steps, hover or click any of them
The fund holds no pension promise on its own books: the promise is the plan’s, the money arrives by statute, and an actuary sets the return to beat. What the fund owns is the independence to take the risk and the duty to explain it in public.
The base and the additional plan: the base plan dates from 1966 and is partly funded (the assets cover about a fifth of the obligations and the contributions the rest, with the contribution rate raised to 9.9% in 1997 to stop the pay-as-you-go drift); the enhancement legislated in 2016 added a second layer of benefits funded by its own contributions from 2019 on the earnings up to the ceiling and from 2024 on a second band above it, designed to be fully funded; the two layers are two accounts at the fund with their own risk targets and their own actuarial tests.
The Chief Actuary: an officer within the federal prudential regulator whose reports on the plan are independent and peer reviewed; the triennial report projects the contributions, the benefits and the assets over 75 years under its demographic and economic assumptions and computes the minimum contribution rate; if the legislated rate were below the minimum and the ministers did not act, the act’s default provisions would raise the rate and freeze the indexation; the fund’s return assumption in the report is the yardstick its board uses for the risk target.
Independence and accountability: the model the Canadian funds are known for abroad (the Maple model) rests on an arm’s-length board of professionals, a mandate limited to returns, the freedom to hire and pay investment staff at market rates and to invest directly, and a heavy public accountability in exchange; the provinces that co-govern the plan sit on the nominating committee and in the triennial review, and the public meetings every two years are a statutory duty.
Where the money sits: the plan’s account at the government holds the contributions and pays the benefits; only the net is transferred to the fund, which keeps a few days of liquidity and invests the rest; in the years when the benefits exceed the contributions the fund transfers cash back; the fund issues its own debt and borrows in the repo market for its leverage (see Leverage and Funding), none of it guaranteed by the government.
Mandate and Allocation›Reference Portfolio
The Reference Portfolio: the Risk Appetite in One Line, the Total Portfolio Approach, the Currency Policy and the Value Added
How a public pension investment manager sets and measures its risk: the reference portfolio of 85% global equity and 15% Canadian bonds as the board’s risk appetite and the benchmark to beat, the total portfolio approach that decomposes every public and private investment into its equity and bond factors, the risk budget with the absolute, the active and the leverage limits, the strategic tilts to the private assets, the real assets and the credit, the currency policy that leaves the developed currencies unhedged, the daily rebalancing with the derivatives, and the value added over the reference net of all costs, published every year.
Worked example, illustrative:the reference 85% global public equity and 15% Canadian government bonds for the base plan; 55% equity for the additional plan, illustrativethe approach every investment decomposed into its equity and bond factors; the balancing portfolio holds the total at the reference’s riskthe budget an absolute risk band around the reference; an active risk limit; a leverage limit on the debt, the repo and the derivatives; a liquidity minimumthe tilts private equity about 30%, real assets 20%, credit 15%, emerging markets and absolute return, illustrative; the balancing portfolio for the restthe currencies developed currencies unhedged by policy; some emerging currencies hedged; the Canadian dollar as a natural hedgethe measure the net return against the reference over one, five and ten years after all costs; 1 to 2 percentage points a year over ten years, illustrative
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInternal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to11 steps, hover or click any of them
One line sets the risk of the whole fund, and everything else is measured against it. The departments spend the equity and bond factors the reference gives them and must return more than the factors cost; the currencies stay open, and the result is published for the contributors to read.
The reference portfolio against a policy portfolio: the classic pension fund sets a strategic asset allocation by asset class (so many percent in each) and measures each class against its own index; the reference portfolio model sets the risk in two factors and lets the fund choose any asset that beats its factor cost, so that the asset mix is an output rather than an input; the Canadian funds pioneered the model and the large funds abroad (the Dutch, the Australian, the Nordic) have adopted versions of it.
The balancing portfolio: the public index positions and the derivatives that fill the gap between the active departments’ factor consumption and the reference’s exposures; when the private departments draw capital it is the balancing portfolio that is sold, and when the private valuations lag the public markets it is the balancing portfolio that carries the drift until the quarter’s valuations arrive; it is where the leverage and the liquidity of the fund are managed.
The currency policy: a fund with Canadian-dollar obligations and three quarters of its assets abroad can hedge, partly hedge or leave the exposure open; the open policy rests on the long horizon, the Canadian dollar’s behavior as a commodity currency that weakens in a global downturn (so the foreign assets gain in Canadian dollars when they lose in their own), the contributors’ consumption of imported goods, and the cost and the collateral of hedging half a trillion dollars; the policy is reviewed with the reference and disclosed each year.
Value added and the public: the measure is simple on purpose, the net return against a passive portfolio anyone could hold, after every cost; it is the argument for the active management and the independence in front of the contributors, and the years when the public indexes beat the diversified fund are the years the argument is tested in the press and at the public meetings.
Public Markets In-House: the Departments, the Brokers, the Derivatives, the Custodian and the Votes
The internal public market departments of a Canadian pension investment manager: the mandates and the pre-trade checks, the research and the data on the fund’s own budget, the orders worked through the brokers’ algorithms, the programs and the blocks across the regions with the TCA after, the futures, the total return swaps and the options with the clearing at LCH and CME under NI 94-101 and the trade reporting by the dealer under OSC Rule 91-507, the settlement at the global custodian at T+1 in North America, the securities lending and the short book through the prime brokers, and the proxy voting published vote by vote.
Worked example, illustrative:the book about CAD 250,000,000,000 in public markets, illustrative: fundamental and quantitative equity, the index replication, fixed income, derivativesthe execution the central desk on an EMS: the brokers’ algorithms, the program trades, the blocks; commissions at the fund’s scale; the TCA by brokerthe derivatives index and bond futures through the clearing brokers; total return swaps and interest rate swaps under ISDAs; options for the tailsthe rules NI 94-101 clearing for the mandated swaps; reporting by the dealer under OSC Rule 91-507 and MI 96-101; uncleared margin with a third-party custodianthe custody the global custodian and its sub-custodians; T+1 through CDS and DTC, T+2 abroad; securities lending through the custodian and an agentthe ownership the votes at thousands of meetings published one by one; the engagement on governance, pay and climate
BankGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructureService providersmessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APISWIFT messageInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to12 steps, hover or click any of them
The fund runs its public assets the way a large asset manager would, with its own desk, its own algorithms and its own votes, but it answers to a two-factor reference rather than to a market index, and the cost of doing it in-house is the argument it makes to the contributors.
In-house against external: the large Canadian funds manage most of their public equity and fixed income internally, with the cost a fraction of the external fees, and keep the external managers for the strategies they cannot build (see External Managers); the trade-off is the fixed cost of the people, the systems and the data, which the annual report discloses as operating expenses.
The derivatives rules as a buy-side institution: under NI 94-101 a pension fund that is a local counterparty must clear the mandated classes (the CAD, USD, EUR and GBP interest rate swaps and the overnight index swaps) through a clearing member; the trade reporting falls on the dealer as the reporting counterparty under OSC Rule 91-507 and MI 96-101; the uncleared margin rules reach the fund through the dealers, which must exchange the initial margin with a counterparty of its size; abroad the same trades meet EMIR and the CFTC’s rules through the counterparties.
Settlement: the move of the Canadian and US markets to T+1 in May 2024 compressed the custodian’s instructions, the FX for the foreign trades and the securities lending recalls into one evening; the fund’s trading desk in Toronto works with the custodian’s overnight operations and the Asian and European offices to fund the trades on time.
Voting and engagement: a fund that owns a few percent of thousands of companies votes them all, publishes the votes and the policy behind them, and engages the boards where its principles call for it; the proxy advisers are an input, not the decision; the securities lent out are recalled before the meetings where the vote matters.
Investing›Private Equity
Private Equity: the Fund Commitments, the Co-Investments, the Direct Deals, the Capital Calls and the Secondaries
The private equity program of a Canadian pension investment manager: the commitment to a general partner’s fund under the LPA and a side letter with the fee discount and the co-investment rights, the co-investment offers underwritten in days with no fee and no carry, the direct deals with the diligence, the acquisition financing and the investment committee’s sizing against the risk budget, the capital calls and the distributions through the custodian and the administrator, the board seats in the direct holdings, the quarterly valuations with the reporting lag, the secondaries market for the fund stakes, and the returns reported net of all costs against levered public equity.
Worked example, illustrative:the program about 30% of the fund, illustrative: commitments to about a hundred GPs, co-investments, direct deals with partners, secondariesthe commitment USD 1,000,000,000 to a buyout fund; the LPA and the side letter: the fee discount, the co-investment rights, the MFN, the LPAC seatthe deal a direct deal led with a partner: the advisers, the acquisition financing from the banks and the private credit funds, the investment committeethe cash capital calls on ten business days’ notice funded from the balancing portfolio; distributions back; the administrator reconcilingthe valuation the GPs’ statements 60 to 90 days after the quarter; the directs valued in-house under IFRS 13; the valuation committee and the auditorsthe measure returns net of fees, carry and costs against a levered global equity benchmark over five and ten years
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsService providersmessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to12 steps, hover or click any of them
The program is three businesses on one balance sheet: commitments that buy access, co-investments that bring the fee load down, and direct deals that bring control. The cash follows the general partners’ calendar, and the benchmark is the levered public equity the program replaces.
The terms at scale: a fund that commits a billion dollars to each of a hundred general partners negotiates the management fee, the transaction fee offsets, the co-investment rights and the reporting; the carried interest (20% of the profits over an 8% preferred return, illustrative) stays the market standard on the fund commitments, and the co-investments without fee or carry are what bring the program’s average cost down.
Direct deals and the governance: in a direct deal the fund is a principal, with the board seats, the shareholder agreement and the responsibility for the company’s governance and its sustainability record; the Canadian funds partner with the general partners or with each other rather than run the companies themselves, and the insider information from the private deals is walled off from the public market desks.
The cash and the liquidity: the unfunded commitments are a liability the fund carries off its balance sheet, called over five years and returned over ten; the liquidity plan holds enough in the balancing portfolio and the credit lines to meet the calls in a stress when the distributions stop (the 2008 and 2022 experiences), and the secondaries market is the valve when the private weight runs above its target.
Valuation and the lag: the private valuations follow the public markets with a quarter’s delay and a smoothing; in a year when the public indexes fall the private book looks steadier than it is, and in a rebound it trails; the total portfolio approach measures the program against the levered equity it replaces and the board reads the five and ten-year numbers, not the year.
Investing›Infrastructure and Real Assets
Infrastructure and Real Assets: the Auction, the Consortium, the Asset-Level Financing, the Foreign Investment Review and the Decades of Ownership
The infrastructure and real asset program of a Canadian pension investment manager: a seller’s two-round auction with the data room, the consortium with another Canadian fund and a sovereign fund, the acquisition and project debt raised at the asset without recourse, the investment committee’s test of the illiquidity premium over the factor cost with the currency left open, the binding bid and the signing, the foreign investment and the competition approvals, the closing funds flow, the board seat and the tariff reviews over the decades of ownership, and the independent valuations behind the returns.
Worked example, illustrative:the program about 20% of the fund, illustrative: toll roads, ports, airports, utilities, renewables, data centers; real estate through platforms and joint venturesthe deal a USD 8,000,000,000 port, illustrative, in a consortium of three, each with a third of the equity; an operating partnerthe financing term loans from the project banks and private placements at the asset level, no recourse to the fund; the rate hedges on the floating debtthe approvals the foreign investment reviews (CFIUS, the NSI Act, the FIRB, the EU screening); the competition authorities; the concession regulatorthe ownership board seats with the partners; the business plan, the capex, the tariff reviews; the distributions through the holding companythe valuation independent appraisers yearly and the team quarterly; the valuation committee; the premium over the factor cost over five and ten years
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructureService providersmessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to12 steps, hover or click any of them
Infrastructure is where the fund’s horizon pays: assets no one else wants to hold for thirty years, bought in consortia, financed at the asset, and owned with a board seat and a regulator across the table.
The consortium: the large assets exceed what one fund wants in one name, so the Canadian funds bid together and with the sovereign funds of the Gulf, Asia and Australia; the consortium agreement is the governance of the asset for decades, and the partners’ exits (the drag and tag rights, the pre-emption) are negotiated before the bid.
Asset-level debt: the fund’s equity is the only recourse; the debt is the asset’s, sized on its cash flows and its rating, refinanced through the decades in the bank, the private placement and the bond markets; the fund’s leverage at the total portfolio level counts this debt through the look-through of the factor exposures.
The foreign investment reviews: a foreign pension fund owning a port, a grid or a telecom network is reviewed in most countries on national security grounds; the Canadian funds’ independence from their government is part of the case they make to the reviewers, and the conditions on the governance and the data are part of the price.
Valuation and the premium: the infrastructure valuations rest on discount rates read from the transactions and change slowly; the premium over the factor cost is the program’s case, and a rise in the real rates (2022) tests it through the discount rates of the next valuations rather than through a market price.
Credit Investments: Direct Lending to the Sponsors, the Syndicated and the Structured Markets, the Agents and the Workouts
The credit book of a Canadian pension investment manager: a USD 800,000,000 unitranche loan led for a sponsor’s buyout, approved by the credit committee and funded through a third-party agent, the leveraged loans and the high yield bought in the primary from the syndicate desks, the secondary trading on the LSTA documents and MarketAxess, the settlement of the bonds through DTC and of the loans through ClearPar, the servicing from the agents’ notices and the borrowers’ financials, the amendments and the workouts with the fund at the table, and the return measured over the bond and equity factors it consumes.
Worked example, illustrative:the book about 15% of the fund, illustrative: direct lending, leveraged loans and high yield, structured credit, real estate debt, royalties and specialty financethe loan a USD 800,000,000 unitranche for a software buyout, illustrative: term SOFR plus a margin, an OID, call protection, covenantsthe markets the syndicated loans on the lender platforms; the high yield on MarketAxess and by phone; the structured credit from the dealers’ liststhe settlement bonds through DTC at T+1; loans assigned on ClearPar with the agent’s consent and recorded in the registerthe servicing the agent’s notices, the resets on term SOFR and CORRA, the borrowers’ quarterly financials and compliance certificatesthe measure the spread over the factor cost; the default losses against the budget; the private loans valued quarterly
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to11 steps, hover or click any of them
The fund lends where the banks used to: to the private equity sponsors’ companies, in size, as the lead. It buys in the syndicated and the structured markets beside, and it sits at the table when a borrower needs more time.
Direct lending: the private credit market grew as the banks retreated from the leveraged loans they could not hold under the capital rules; the large pension funds lend directly to the sponsors’ companies as leads, with a premium over the syndicated market for the certainty, the speed and the confidentiality they offer, and with the governance of a lender that holds its loan to maturity.
The loan market’s plumbing: a loan is not a security, so it settles by assignment rather than by delivery: the trade on the LSTA confirmation, the assignment on ClearPar, the agent’s consent and register, the cash between the parties’ custodians; the target is seven days for the par trades and the reality is often longer, with the delayed compensation paid to the buyer.
Structured credit: the ABS, the CLO tranches and the mortgage credit give the fund the consumer, the corporate and the property credit in tranches of its chosen risk; the CLO equity and the mezzanine tranches carry an equity-like factor and the senior tranches a bond-like one, so the total portfolio approach places them on both sides.
Workouts: a lead lender with a large hold negotiates the amendments and the restructurings directly with the sponsor rather than through a syndicate; the fund’s horizon and its capacity to take the equity in a restructuring are part of the premium it is paid, and part of the risk.
Investing›External Managers
External Managers: the Selection, the Managed Accounts, the Fees, the Monitoring, the Transitions and the Cost Disclosure
How a Canadian pension investment manager uses the external managers: the selection with the due diligence and the operational due diligence by the fund’s own staff, the investment committee’s approval of the size and the terms, the managed account in the fund’s name at its custodian or the commingled fund with a side letter, the management and the performance fees, the manager trading through its prime brokers, the daily monitoring through the custodian and the administrator, the termination with a transition manager, and the fees published in dollars in the annual report.
Worked example, illustrative:the program hedge funds for the absolute return allocation; emerging markets equity; specialist mandates; no consultantsthe allocation USD 500,000,000 to a manager, illustrative; the active risk drawn from the department’s budgetthe vehicle a managed account in the fund’s name with full transparency, or a fund with a side letter: the fee discount, capacity, the MFNthe fees a management fee and a performance fee over a hurdle with a high-water mark, crystallized yearly; verified against the administratorthe monitoring daily positions in the IBOR from the custodian and the administrator; monthly letters; quarterly meetingsthe disclosure management and performance fees in dollars in the annual report beside the operating and the transaction costs
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to11 steps, hover or click any of them
The external managers are the fund’s purchased capabilities: selected by its own staff, held in its own name where possible, measured on the same factors as the internal teams, and paid fees the fund publishes for the contributors to read.
The managed account: the assets stay in the fund’s name at its custodian, the manager trades them as an agent under the IMA, the fund sees every position every day and can take the account back at once; the cost is the fund’s own operations for the prime brokerage and the ISDA documents, and not every manager accepts one; the 2008 gates and the frauds of that year are the reason the large funds prefer it.
The fees at scale: the large funds negotiate the management fee down, ask for a hurdle and a high-water mark on the performance fee, the crystallization yearly rather than quarterly, and the most favored nation clause; the performance fees paid to the best managers are large in a good year, and the annual report shows them in dollars.
Transition management: moving a portfolio from one manager to another, or into the fund’s own index positions, without paying the market twice; the transition manager crosses what it can internally, trades the rest with the algorithms over days, and reports the implementation shortfall against the pre-trade estimate.
The disclosure of costs: the Canadian funds publish every cost line (the operating expenses, the external management fees, the performance fees, the transaction costs) because the contributors can compare them with a passive alternative; the value added over the reference is measured after all of them.
The Fund’s Own Debt: the Commercial Paper, the Global and Euro Medium-Term Notes and the Green Bonds
How a public pension investment manager borrows: a wholly owned finance subsidiary issues with the fund’s unconditional guarantee, rated AAA on the fund’s own credit; the Canadian and US commercial paper posted each morning and settled the same day through CDS and DTC; a USD 3,000,000,000 five-year global benchmark priced over SOFR mid-swaps to the central banks, the bank treasuries and the asset managers, settled at T+5 through DTC, Euroclear and Clearstream; the green bonds with their allocation reports; the whole program inside the board’s leverage limit and published in the annual report.
Worked example, illustrative:the issuer a wholly owned finance subsidiary; the fund’s unconditional guarantee; no government guaranteethe programs CAD and USD commercial paper; a global MTN program (144A and Regulation S); a euro MTN program; green bondsthe ratings AAA from the agencies and DBRS Morningstar on the fund’s own credit, illustrativethe benchmark USD 3,000,000,000 five years over SOFR mid-swaps; one benchmark a year in USD, EUR, CAD and GBP, illustrativethe settlement the CP the same day through DTC and CDS; the notes at T+5 through DTC, Euroclear, Clearstream and CDSthe governance the board’s leverage limit; the yearly funding plan; the debt in the annual report
BankGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructureService providersmessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to11 steps, hover or click any of them
A pension fund with a government-like credit borrows like a supranational: commercial paper every morning, benchmarks a few times a year, green bonds with their reports. The debt is a balance sheet tool inside one limit the board sets, and nothing in it is guaranteed by the government.
The issuing structure: the large Canadian funds issue through a finance subsidiary with the parent fund’s guarantee, so the investors face the fund’s credit and the fund keeps the debt off the plan’s accounts; the fund is not an agent of the Crown and the government does not guarantee the debt, so the ratings rest on the fund’s leverage, liquidity, size and statutory inflows; the debt is recourse to the fund, unlike the debt of its portfolio companies, which is recourse only to them.
The SSA-style market: the investors treat the fund’s notes like those of the supranationals, the sovereigns and the agencies (the SSA market): the same formats, the same syndicate desks, the same official and bank buyers; the spread sits between the government agencies and the provinces, and the bank treasuries buy the notes for their liquidity buffers where the regulators accept them as high-quality liquid assets.
Green bonds: the green bond framework sets the eligible categories (the renewable energy, the green buildings, the sustainable agriculture and forestry, the water), the selection process and the reporting; the fund allocates an amount equal to the proceeds to eligible investments, reports the allocation and the impact each year with an external review, and the green tranches price at or slightly through the conventional curve.
Why a pension fund borrows: the reference portfolio asks for an equity and bond exposure on the whole net assets while half the assets sit in private holdings and the active programs; the balancing portfolio holds the gap with futures, swaps and borrowed money; the term debt and the CP lengthen and diversify that funding beyond the overnight repo, which the 2020 and 2022 episodes showed can tighten when the margin calls rise (see Balance Sheet and Leverage).
The Balance Sheet: Recourse Leverage, the Liquidity Coverage, the Repo, the Lending and the Margin
How a public pension investment manager runs its balance sheet: total assets of CAD 850,000,000,000 against net assets of CAD 700,000,000,000 with CAD 150,000,000,000 of recourse borrowing (repo, term debt, CP and the derivatives’ financing), inside the board’s leverage limit and liquidity minimum; the daily cash forecast of the capital calls and the closings, the repo and the reverse repo, the securities lending and the collateral transformation, the internal transfer rate, the margin calls of the cleared and the uncleared derivatives, and the stress lessons of 2020 and 2022.
Worked example, illustrative:the balance sheet total assets CAD 850,000,000,000 against net assets of CAD 700,000,000,000; recourse borrowing CAD 150,000,000,000, illustrativethe leverage repo CAD 60,000,000,000, term debt CAD 50,000,000,000, CP CAD 15,000,000,000 and the derivatives’ financing, illustrativethe liquidity liquid assets against the stressed outflows over thirty days and a year; a minimum set by the boardthe margin the cleared VM daily in cash; the uncleared VM under the CSAs and the IM at a third-party custodianthe lending equities and bonds lent at 102% to 105%; the transformation trades within the limitsthe references the March 2020 dash for cash; the 2022 rate and currency moves; the UK LDI episode
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to11 steps, hover or click any of them
No liabilities on the books, yet a bank-like balance sheet: borrowed money and derivatives hold the reference exposures, the private assets draw cash on their own calendar, and the margin calls arrive with the market falls. The leverage limit and the liquidity buffer keep the fund a seller by choice.
Recourse and non-recourse leverage: the fund counts as recourse leverage the debt it issues, the repo it borrows and the financing embedded in its derivatives, all of which the fund must repay or margin; the debt inside its portfolio companies, real estate and infrastructure assets is non-recourse to the fund and sits inside the valuation of each asset; the board’s limit applies to the recourse leverage, and the total exposure measure adds the look-through.
The liquidity coverage: the large Canadian funds measure the liquid assets they could raise in a stress (the government bonds at a small haircut, the listed equity at a larger one, the cash) against the outflows they could face (the margin on the derivatives in a market fall, the unfunded commitments called, the collateral on the debt and the repo, the maturing CP), over thirty days and over a year; the measure resembles a bank’s LCR without a regulator setting it.
Securities lending and transformation: a large fund lends its equities to the short sellers and its bonds to the dealers for a fee, against cash reinvested in short paper or against non-cash collateral; the transformation trades go further and lend the best bonds against lesser collateral to earn a spread; both are limited by the liquidity minimum, since the lent assets and the collateral received must come back in a stress.
The stress lessons: March 2020 tested the funds that held their equity exposure through total return swaps and futures, since the margin rose as the markets fell while the capital calls continued; the funds that had the term debt and the liquid buffer met the calls without selling at the lows; the September 2022 gilt crisis in the UK, where the LDI funds had too little liquidity for the margin, is now the case every levered pension balance sheet is tested against.
Currency and Collateral: the Hedge Program, the Platforms, CLS, the CSAs and the Daily Margin
How a public pension investment manager manages its currencies and its collateral: the strategic policy that leaves the developed currencies largely open and hedges some emerging currencies and some private assets, the needs netted across the departments, the monthly roll of USD 20,000,000,000 of forwards in competitive RFQs on the multi-dealer platforms, the confirmations and the TCA, the CLS settlement with the Canadian dollar paid in through Lynx, the credit support annexes and the uncleared margin rules, the daily calls and the collateral optimization, and the counterparty limits.
Worked example, illustrative:the policy developed currencies largely unhedged; hedge ratios for some emerging currencies; private assets hedged case by casethe program USD 20,000,000,000 of forwards rolled monthly in FX swaps, illustrative; deal-contingent forwards for the closingsthe execution competitive RFQs to four or five dealers on FXall and 360T; the 4pm fix for the large spot; the TCA and the scorecardsthe settlement CLS through the settlement member; the Canadian dollar through Lynx; the non-CLS currencies grossthe collateral CSAs with zero thresholds; the uncleared IM at a third-party custodian; the cheapest eligible collateral each morningthe control counterparty exposure against the limits by rating; quarterly to the risk committee
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APISWIFT messageInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to10 steps, hover or click any of them
The policy leaves most of the currency risk open, and the hedges the fund does keep still run to hundreds of billions a year. They are dealt on the platforms, settled through CLS and margined every morning under the CSAs.
Hedging the private assets: the strategic policy leaves the currency of most foreign holdings open, but a private investment whose return is small against the currency’s volatility (a regulated utility in sterling with a bond-like return, a loan in a high-yield currency) is hedged at the deal level so that the investment case does not depend on the currency; the hedges roll for the life of the asset and draw margin when the currency moves in the asset’s favor.
The platforms and the TCA: the large asset owners execute their FX forwards and swaps in competitive RFQs on the multi-dealer platforms and measure every fill against the mid and the fixing; the 2014 and 2015 FX benchmark cases made the fix execution and the dealers’ handling of the client orders a supervised conduct matter, and the FX Global Code sets the standard the fund asks its dealers to follow.
The uncleared margin rules: the final phase in 2022 brought the large pension funds into the initial margin regime for their uncleared derivatives (the FX forwards and swaps are exempt from the initial margin in most jurisdictions but the options, the cross-currency swaps and the total return swaps are not); the initial margin is computed with the industry’s standard model, posted and received in segregated accounts at third-party custodians, and reconciled daily.
Collateral optimization: the fund’s collateral comes from the same inventory as its repo, its securities lending and its liquidity buffer; a central team allocates the cheapest eligible asset to each call across the CSAs, the CCPs, the tri-party schedules and the repo, keeps the high-quality bonds for the stress, and reports the encumbered assets daily.
Operations and Custody›Custody Operations
Custody Operations: the Global Custodian, Fifty Markets, the Income, the Tax Relief, the Votes and the Daily Reconciliations
How a public pension investment manager’s public portfolio is held and serviced: the trades booked and confirmed, the settlement instructions to the global custodian and its subcustodians in fifty markets, the income and the corporate actions, the relief at source and the reclaims on the foreign withholding under the fund’s exempt status, the proxy votes cast through the chain, and the daily reconciliations of the IBOR, the accounting book and the custodian before the morning.
Worked example, illustrative:the custodian one global custodian under a master custody agreement; subcustodians in 50 markets, illustrativethe settlement DVP in each market’s depository; T+1 in North America since May 2024, T+2 in most othersthe servicing the income credited on the pay dates; the corporate action elections through the portalthe taxes relief at source on the documented exempt status; the reclaims; the claims against discriminatory withholdingthe votes every share voted under the published principles; the record on the fund’s sitethe controls the IBOR, the ABOR and the custodian reconciled daily; the breaks closed before the morning
BankAsset managerThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APISWIFT messageInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to11 steps, hover or click any of them
One custodian holds the public portfolio across fifty markets; the operations team is the fund’s control over it. The instructions go out, the income, the actions and the taxes come back, the votes are cast, and every position is reconciled before the market opens.
The custody model: a large pension fund appoints one global custodian (sometimes two, for the competition and the resilience) under a master custody agreement; the custodian holds the assets in segregated accounts, reaches the markets through its own branches and the subcustodians it selects and monitors, and offers the tax, the proxy, the securities lending and the data services on top; the fund keeps its own IBOR and checks the custodian rather than relying on it.
Tax relief and reclaims: a pension fund that is exempt at home pays the foreign withholding unless a treaty or a domestic exemption relieves it; the relief at source needs the documentation of the fund’s status (the US foreign government exemption, the treaty pension articles), the reclaims recover the excess in the markets that withhold at the full rate, and the claims under the EU law against the higher withholding on foreign pension funds have recovered large amounts over a decade.
Proxy voting: the fund votes at thousands of meetings a year; the chain from the issuer to the beneficial owner runs through the depositories, the custodian and the voting platform, and the large Canadian funds publish their voting principles, their votes and their engagement; the split voting of the shares held for the base and the additional plans is avoided by voting the combined position.
The data platform: the custodian’s data, the dealers’ confirmations, the CCPs’ statements, the private asset valuations and the market data meet in the fund’s own data platform, where the IBOR, the accounting book, the risk and the performance read the same positions; the daily reconciliation is what lets the total portfolio group rebalance on numbers it trusts.
Operations and Custody›Deal Closing
Closing a Private Investment: the Funds Flow, the Holding Vehicle, the Wires and the Registers
How a public pension investment manager closes a private investment: the investment committee’s decision on a GBP 1,500,000,000 stake in a UK regulated utility with consortium partners, the foreign investment and the antitrust clearances and the holding structure, the funds flow memo with the call-backs on every wire instruction, the sterling bought ahead and the cash moved down to the holding company, the closing-day wires under dual approval, the price, the debt and the escrow paid, the registers updated, and the post-closing reconciliation; a fund capital call handled the same way.
Worked example, illustrative:the deal a GBP 1,500,000,000 stake in a UK regulated utility with consortium partners, illustrativethe approvals the investment committee and the board above its authority; the NSI Act, CFIUS or FIRB as the case may be; the antitrustthe structure a UK holding company owned by a Canadian subsidiary of the fund; equity and a shareholder loanthe cash the sterling bought forward or deal-contingent; the balancing portfolio sold the week beforethe closing wires under dual approval with call-backs; CHAPS to the sellers; the escrow funded; the registers updatedthe books booked at cost until the first valuation; the funds flow reconciled; the escrow tracked
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APISWIFT messageInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to10 steps, hover or click any of them
No depository settles a private deal: the fund does it itself, with a funds flow memo, a holding vehicle, a set of wires and the registers. The call-back and the dual approval are the controls a CSD would otherwise give.
The holding vehicles: the large Canadian funds hold their private assets abroad through wholly owned subsidiaries, often one per country or per strategy, chosen for the treaty access, the local governance and the limitation of the liability; the subsidiaries are investment entities measured at fair value in the fund’s statements, and their accounts, directors and filings are run by the fund’s legal and operations teams.
Wire fraud: the closing of a private deal moves large sums to accounts the fund has not paid before, on instructions that arrive by email from many parties; the business email compromise (a forged change of the receiving account) is the main fraud risk, and the controls are the call-back to a known number, the dual approval, the small test payment where time allows, and the bank’s own payee checks.
Consortium deals: the large infrastructure and real estate assets are bought in consortia of pension and sovereign funds, each with its own holding vehicle and funds flow, coordinated by the lead investor and counsel; the shareholders’ agreement sets the governance, the transfer rights and the information each partner receives, and the fund’s directors on the asset’s board are its governance after the closing.
Capital calls and commitments: the fund commitments are called over four to six years; the operations team keeps the commitment ledger (the committed, the called, the unfunded, the distributed), checks each call against the LPA, and feeds the unfunded commitments into the liquidity coverage, since a market stress can bring the calls forward while the distributions slow.
Operations and Custody›Valuation and Accounting
Valuation and Accounting: the Private Marks, the Valuation Committee, the Investment Entity, the Costs and the Audit
How a public pension investment manager values and reports its portfolio: the board’s valuation policy under IFRS 13, the public positions priced daily, the general partners’ statements rolled forward and the deal teams’ marks challenged by an independent valuation team, the appraisers and the advisers, the valuation committee, the investment entity accounting under IFRS 10 that measures every investment at fair value, the net return, the value added and the full cost disclosure, the external audit with its valuation specialists, and the annual report to the ministers and Parliament.
Worked example, illustrative:the policy IFRS 13 fair value; the hierarchy; an independent valuation team; a committee chaired by the CFOthe public the level 1 and level 2 assets priced daily from the markets, the vendors and the curvesthe private about half the fund at level 3; the GP statements rolled forward; the deal teams’ marks challenged; the appraisals on a rotationthe accounting an investment entity under IFRS 10: no consolidation, fair value through profit or loss; net income allocated to the two accountsthe costs operating expenses CAD 1,600,000,000, the management and performance fees, the transaction costs, illustrativethe audit the external auditors’ opinion and valuation specialists; the audit committee; the annual report tabled in Parliament
Asset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructureService providersmessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInternal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to10 steps, hover or click any of them
Half the fund has no market price, so the reported return rests on a valuation process: the GP statements rolled forward, the marks challenged by an independent team, the appraisers, the committee and the auditors. The investment entity accounting puts every value straight into the net income.
The investment entity exception: IFRS 10 exempts an entity whose business is to invest for returns and that measures its investments at fair value from consolidating the companies it controls; the large Canadian funds apply it, so a controlled airport or a utility appears as one fair value line rather than its revenues, debts and employees, and the change in its value runs through the net income each quarter.
The private valuation lag: the GP statements and the internal marks follow the public markets with a delay and less volatility, so the fund’s reported risk and return look smoother than the economics; the roll-forward of the stale statements, the use of the public comparables and the total portfolio approach’s factor view (a private equity stake as levered equity) are the corrections the funds apply and explain.
The cost disclosure: the large Canadian funds publish their full costs (the operating expenses with the staff and the offices, the management and the performance fees paid to the external managers, the transaction costs of the deals) in dollars and basis points and argue that the internal management at scale costs less than the external fees it replaces; the value added is reported after all of them.
The audit and the examination: the external auditor, appointed by the board, audits the statements each year; the same firm or one appointed by the minister carries out the special examination of the systems and practices at least every six years; the audit committee of the board oversees both and the internal audit function.
Control and Accountability›Public Accountability
The Accountability Cycle: the Quarterly Results, the Report to Parliament, the Public Meetings, the Triennial Review and the Special Examination
How a public pension investment manager is held to account: the quarterly results, the annual report with the audited statements and every cost sent to the federal and provincial ministers and tabled in Parliament within fifteen sitting days, the public meetings in each participating province every two years, the triennial review of the plan by the ministers on the Chief Actuary’s report, the directors appointed from the nominating committee, the special examination of the systems and practices at least every six years, and the press and the public in between.
Worked example, illustrative:the quarter the net assets and the return published; the five and ten-year results leading the messagethe year the annual report to the federal and provincial ministers; tabled in Parliament within fifteen sitting days; fiscal year to March 31two years a public meeting in each participating province, announced ten days ahead in a newspaperthree years the ministers’ triennial review on the Chief Actuary’s report; directors’ terms of up to three yearssix years the special examination of the systems and practices by the board’s auditor or one the minister appointsin between the press, the contributors and the members of Parliament; the disclosure policy
Group entitiesThe asset ownerClientMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInternal systemOtherhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to10 steps, hover or click any of them
A fund no minister can direct is held to account by publicity rather than by a prudential regulator. The cycle runs on four clocks: the annual report to Parliament, the public meetings every two years, the ministerial review every three and the special examination every six.
The statutory clocks: the fund’s act sets each step: the annual report to the minister and its tabling in each House within fifteen sitting days, the public meetings in each participating province at least once every two years with the newspaper notice, the special examination at least once every six years; the triennial review belongs to the plan’s own legislation and the Chief Actuary’s cycle.
Independence and accountability as a pair: the board is appointed by the ministers but cannot be directed by them, and the investment staff are hired and paid by the board at market rates; in exchange the fund publishes more than most private managers (every cost line, the compensation, the votes, the large holdings) and appears before the public and Parliament on a fixed schedule.
The provinces: the plan is a joint federal-provincial program, and the provinces sit on the nominating committee, receive the annual report, take part in the triennial review and hold a veto over the changes to the plan through the two-thirds rule; the province that runs its own plan and its own investment manager follows a parallel model.
The scrutiny cases: the public debates around the large Canadian funds have concerned the executive compensation in years of low returns, the costs of the offices abroad, the investments in companies or countries the public objects to, and the climate commitments set and then revised; each becomes a question at a public meeting or a parliamentary committee, which is the accountability the model relies on.
Control and Accountability›Risk Oversight
Risk Oversight: the Appetite, the Factor Model, the Limits, the Counterparties, the Operational and the Climate Risks
How a public pension investment manager oversees its risks without a prudential regulator: the board’s risk appetite and limits, the factor model that measures the public and the private assets on the same exposures, the total and the active risk, the stress tests and the liquidity, the limits owned by the departments and monitored daily by an independent risk group, the counterparty and the credit risks, the operational, the cyber and the third-party risks, the climate scenario analysis and the commitments set and revised, the quarterly reporting to the risk committee and the three lines of defense.
Worked example, illustrative:the appetite the absolute risk band around the reference; the active risk; the leverage and the liquidity; the concentrations; the operational appetitethe measure one factor model for public and private assets; the loss at a confidence level over a year; the historical and the hypothetical stressesthe lines the departments own the risk; the independent risk group under the CRO; the internal auditthe counterparties exposures net of collateral against the limits by rating; the wrong-way risk; the early signalsthe climate the scenario analysis and the due diligence; the 2050 targets set in 2021 and 2022, the largest withdrawn in May 2025the reporting daily to the CIO and the CRO; quarterly to the risk committee; the appetite reviewed yearly
BankAsset managerGroup entitiesThe asset ownerMarket participantsMarket infrastructuremessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APIInternal systemhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to10 steps, hover or click any of them
No regulator sets this fund’s capital, so its risk discipline comes from its own board. One appetite is expressed against the reference portfolio, the private assets are measured by their factors rather than their marks, and the CRO reports to the risk committee every quarter.
Measuring the private assets: the private holdings’ reported values move slowly, so a risk model that used them would show half the fund as nearly riskless; the total portfolio approach measures each private asset through its exposures to the public factors (a buyout as levered equity, a toll road as a mix of equity and inflation-linked bonds), which gives the board a total risk close to the economic one.
Three lines of defense: the departments own their risks and their limits (the first line), the independent risk group under the chief risk officer measures, challenges and escalates (the second), and the internal audit tests both (the third); the CRO reports to the CEO and has a direct line to the board’s risk committee.
Climate commitments: the large Canadian pension funds set portfolio net zero targets for 2050 in 2021 and 2022 with interim measures (the carbon intensity, the green investments); from 2024 the legal developments (the greenwashing provisions of the Competition Act, the diverging rules abroad) led several institutions to revise their public commitments, and in May 2025 the largest fund withdrew its target while keeping the climate risk in its due diligence and its decisions.
Without a capital regime: the fund is not supervised by the prudential regulator (it is not a federally regulated pension plan and holds no policyholder liability), so no capital ratio constrains it; the board’s risk appetite, the leverage limit, the liquidity minimum and the public reporting are the constraints, and the special examination and the auditors test whether they work.
Control and Accountability›Tax and Regulation
Tax and Regulation: the Exempt Status, the Holding Structures, Section 892, the Reviews and the Filings
The tax and the regulatory standing of a public pension investment manager: the tax-exempt Crown corporation at home, the early warning, the insider and the derivatives filings with the Canadian securities regulators, the holding structures abroad, the US exemption for the foreign governments’ investment income under section 892 and its final regulations of December 2025, the UK and the Australian sovereign immunity regimes and the treaties, the relief at source and the reclaims, the foreign investment reviews a state-linked investor faces, the offices’ licenses abroad and the conduct rules.
Worked example, illustrative:at home a Crown corporation exempt from income tax; not an agent of the Crown; no prudential supervision; the securities laws applythe filings early warning at 10% or the alternative monthly reports; insider reports; the derivatives reporting and clearing as a financial entitythe US section 892 for a foreign government’s controlled entity; final regulations of December 15, 2025; FIRPTA and the pension fund exemptionelsewhere the UK exemption on an HMRC clearance; Australia’s sovereign immunity on a ruling; the treaty rates; the reclaimsthe reviews CFIUS, the NSI Act, FIRB and the EU screening for a state-linked investorthe conduct the code, the personal trading, the lobbying registrations, the anti-corruption, the sanctions, the information barriers
Asset managerThe asset ownerMarket infrastructureService providersmessage or transferstanding flowexchanged and matchedoption, when needed1sequence, on the party that actsVoice, chatElectronic platform, APISWIFT messageInfrastructure system (payment, clearing, reporting)Internal systemhover an arrow or a badge for the full detail
Jump to10 steps, hover or click any of them
A fund that pays no tax at home works hard not to pay more than it should abroad, through the holding vehicles, the treaties, the government exemptions and the reclaims. As a state-linked investor it also faces the foreign investment reviews its private peers do not.
Section 892: the US exempts from its income tax the investment income of a foreign government, including its controlled entities such as a public pension fund, on its stocks, bonds and financial instruments, but not the income from commercial activities; an entity that holds 50% or more of a commercial business, or controls it effectively, is a controlled commercial entity and loses the exemption on all its income; the final regulations of December 15, 2025 settled the treatment of the partnership interests (a safe harbor at 5% for the limited partners) and allowed a cure within 180 days for an inadvertent commercial activity.
FIRPTA and the pension fund exemption: the gains on US real property interests are taxed under FIRPTA even for a section 892 investor when the holding is commercial; since 2015 the qualified foreign pension funds are exempt from FIRPTA, and the large Canadian funds structure their US real estate and infrastructure holdings around the two exemptions.
State-linked investors and the reviews: the foreign investment regimes treat a public pension fund as a government-linked investor, so a stake in a sensitive sector triggers a filing (mandatory under CFIUS for a foreign government-controlled investor acquiring a substantial interest in some US businesses) and sometimes a mitigation agreement on the governance or the data; the large Canadian funds have argued for and obtained lighter treatment in some regimes as passive investors.
The securities filings: in Canada a holder crossing 10% of a class of an issuer’s voting or equity securities files an early warning report, or, as an eligible institutional investor without a takeover intention, the alternative monthly report; the fund’s derivatives fall under the CSA’s trade reporting rules (the dealers report for it as the reporting counterparties) and the clearing mandate for the standard swaps between financial entities.
1
→ next, ← previous, Esc exit. Click any step in the diagram to jump to it.